Lawyeringforlawyers
This can be deemed an advertisement in some jurisdictions.
  • Home
  • About Steve
  • Law Firm Blog
  • Humor Blog
  • Contact

SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS ARE LATERALS

10/11/2017

1 Comment

 
       Mobility in the modern law practice is a given and hires from other firms are called laterals.  While the old law firm model was to hire out of law school and often keep them until retirement, that certainly has changed with the very common hiring of lawyers from other firms.
     The reason “laterals” or “merged attorneys” get mentioned so often is because professional liability carriers have noted sharp upticks in claims arising from laterals’ conduct and also from the conflicts they can bring to a new firm, if not properly resolved in advance.  My theory is that firms are so anxious to get new business that they do not do the kind of due diligence on new lateral hires that they would insist their clients do in a business deal.  Firms should always require possible new lawyers to provide extensive personal, financial and bar related information under confidentiality agreements.  This failure to examine all about a lateral carefully can get you someone else’s problem, as bad as a car flooded out by a hurricane.  Likewise, their clients can be cross-checked under tight conflicts procedures to see what conflict issues might exist if they do join.  Resolution of these should be a big factor in any hire or merge decision.
     Like most people, laterals will do things the way they did before and this could generate claims issues when not monitored.  Firms should have a formal integration process for laterals that is better than the one they use for new hires.  Particularly with lawyers now coming into a loss prevention conscious firm, old loose habits have to be changed and the new loss preventative procedures adopted, despite their complaints along the lines of “I just want to practice law”, rather than do the things you now require of me.
     In the Minnesota Lawyer recently, Charles Lundberg discussed this subject and listed an American Lawyers article on the subject.  There have been spectacular issues with hiring a lawyer who either brings or creates bad mojo for the new firm.  These articles are good to point out how serious the problem can be to you.
     However, the more regular lateral issue often comes about by promises made, but never met, and after years of paying them too much, it doesn’t work out.  “We wish them well” is in the typical notice that Fred will be leaving the firm.  This is not a new loss topic.  Lots has been written about laterals and losses, but law firms keep doing this with, at best, a 50/50 financial success ratio, not to mention the greatly increased number of legal malpractice claims they generate.  Think about that:  50/50 chance of success, but with a risk of conflicts and claims either way.
     In a single firm study, I have seen better than this 50/50 without any big claims issues and with long-term friends who have done well for the firm.  My point is that you must (1) do due diligence; (2) resolve conflict issues; and (3) integrate them into the firm.  I have seen many big successes by way of merger or lateral hires, including a successful Managing Member in the study firm.  They did full due diligence and lots of advance conflict work, but they still had some failures like the national stats show for all.  I really do have many good friends in the successful lateral hire category.

See Model Rules 1.10 and 1.9 for screening and conflicts. 

1 Comment

    Author

    Steve Crislip was the General Counsel and Loss Prevention Member to a 11 office and 7 jurisdiction law firm for 10 years and has been defending lawyers and firms for more than 25 years and litigating for 40 years.
    These articles reflect lessons learned for Law Firms.

    Archives

    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All
    Ames & Gough
    Checklists
    Computers And Lawyers
    Confidentialty And Lawyers
    Guidelines
    Law Firms
    Law Office Practice
    Law Office Practice
    Lawyers On Boards
    Legal Claims
    Legal Claims
    Legal Malpractice
    Legal Malpractice
    Loss Prevention
    Loss Prevention
    Loss Prevention In Law Firms
    Professional Liability
    Professional Liabilty

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.