Lawyeringforlawyers
This can be deemed an advertisement in some jurisdictions.
  • Home
  • About Steve
  • Law Firm Blog
  • Humor Blog
  • Contact

WHEN DO YOU PULL BACK THE THROTTLE ON YOUR PRACTICE?

8/2/2013

0 Comments

 
     No lawyer has ever entered the Pearly Gates and said:  “Dang, I wish I had billed more hours.”  The problem is that we lawyers enjoy what we do (mostly) and worse, we identify our standing and self-esteem in the context of our profession and our firms.  Aside from the loss of income, we lawyers are reluctant to yield that earned position.  A very natural tension develops between young hard charging partners and those with 40 plus years of service who feel they built the firm and have earned the top spots, despite taking off much more time and doing less in the eyes of some.  So, there is the question with no good answer and it is the source of heartburn in many firms.

     It is a fine balance because you, the mature lawyer, bring much to the table, yet you are not up to the 14 hour trial days you once handled with ease.  I personally have chosen a modified approach by soon voluntarily leaving the equity ownership, even though I have seven more years of eligibility.  The plan is to still practice, doing that which I enjoy, but fully recognizing that I am yielding the General Counsel position and other firm positions that tended to make the younger people listen to me.  Giving notice of 2½ years, I often had to firmly state:  “I am not dead yet”, as they sometimes try to walk around me to get a different answer from my successor in training.  That is just the nature of any “lame duck” position. 

     The personal issue for each of you has to be about you and your family, not just the money.  Understand the underlying pressures from your younger partners if you have cut back your effort, but not your income, and balance the fairness.  How did you react as a young partner?  Most firms have now embraced the modified concept and gone away from the gold watch and the move to Florida retirement.  Non-Equity and Counsel positions allow the flexibility of continued practice and income based upon your production, or based upon an agreed annual number.  Think it out in advance and strike a workable deal.  I am a believer in going out on top.  Do not be the elderly lawyer hiding your own Easter eggs.

     Bob Minto, retired CEO of the lawyers’ liability carrier ALPS, posted an article recently “To Retire or Not to Retire, That is the Question”.
[1]  As he says, there is no magic answer, but we both advocate considered judgment and thoughtful analysis in advance.

     My wife’s uncle, an aeronautical engineer, retired in 1965 and at age 97 living in southern California, has had a wonderful complete second life.  I shoot skeet with a 97-year-old psychiatrist who retired in 1985 and keeps mentally sharp with daily reading and puzzles.  Yet we see “young” lawyers afflicted with illness and issues that have prevented the above types of retirements.

     Some of the other published thoughts out there are almost comical.  Medical data suggest a mental slow down and losing a step or two (as in, did I already wash my hair?) at a certain age.  Yet other data indicates active brain involvement by not retiring before 65 decreased the odds of dementia than if you retired at age 60.  The World Health Organization (WHO) sets “healthy life expectancy” by country to determine the most sensible ages for retirement.  The Center for Disease Control (CDC) keeps U.S. stats and, of course, the healthy stats for states points the way for the best retirement (Hawaii the best and Mississippi the worst).  So the previously lived quality of life is the big factor in the quality of the retirement issue it seems. 

     There just is no absolute answer, but you need to think it out in advance.  Don’t go full throttle as a lawyer, quit, and then whither.  As Toby Keith says in his country song:  “I am not as good as I once was, but I am as good once as I ever was.”  Wonder what he meant there?  In any event, think it out and plan it out.  Do what is best for you and your family, not the billable hour.


[1] ALPS 411 site, June 11, 2013, by Robert Minto.

0 Comments

    Author

    Steve Crislip was the General Counsel and Loss Prevention Member to a 11 office and 7 jurisdiction law firm for 10 years and has been defending lawyers and firms for more than 25 years and litigating for 40 years.
    These articles reflect lessons learned for Law Firms.

    Archives

    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All
    Ames & Gough
    Checklists
    Computers And Lawyers
    Confidentialty And Lawyers
    Guidelines
    Law Firms
    Law Office Practice
    Law Office Practice
    Lawyers On Boards
    Legal Claims
    Legal Claims
    Legal Malpractice
    Legal Malpractice
    Loss Prevention
    Loss Prevention
    Loss Prevention In Law Firms
    Professional Liability
    Professional Liabilty

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.